First, a few snippets of history. The NBA arrived in Seattle on in 1967, 39 years ago. The arena was then known as the "Seattle Center" (constructed in 1962) as part of Seattle's World's Fair construction. See http://www.historylink.org/essays/output.cfm?file_id=1321 and
http://www.historylink.org/this_week/index.cfm. According to the latter,
In 1983, the franchise was sold to Barry Ackerley, and for the next 20 years the team experienced many ups and downs (mostly downs). Under his threat to move the team, the City transformed the Seattle Center Coliseum, whose leaky roof led to the only "rain out" in NBA history, into Key Arena in 1993.From the little I've read, it appears that the 1993 product is substantially the same as is in place today. At 17,072 maximum capacity, it is the smallest NBA arena. All NBA arena capacities (including Oklahoma City) are ordered by arena capacities, smallest to largest, below:
|18K - 18,999|
|19K - 19,999|
|20K - 20,999|
|21K - 21,999|
S. Ant. (21)
L.A. (20 x 2)
G. State (14)
New York (12)
|New Jersey (9)|
|Chicago (2)||Detroit (1)|
See http://www.dougloudenback.com/hornets/NBAarenas.htm for arena pics and capacities.
In the context of this post, can/will the Key Arena be expanded (or a new facility be built) to place it at least in the middle of the pack, at or better than Oklahoma City's capacity? Toronto's 19,500 is presently "at the middle" (Okc's Ford Center is 19,163). Seating capacity does not only equal more ticket sales, it relates to concessions, gear, box seats revenue, parking, etc., which occur on game days, assuming that the team's contract allows all or a substantial portion of those revenues to flow to the team. But, that is a different topic, for another day. This post is only intended to cover arena capacity issues, if they are important.