Sunday, February 17, 2008

Ford Center Watch Party

Click a control to stop/start the sound

The kickoff party for the March 4 Ford Center vote started at 7:00 p.m. on February 17 at Buffalo Wild Wings on Northwest Expressway ... click the image below to go to the Big League City website ... or here for the Chamber's Big League City website.

The hopes, if not expectations, of Oklahoma City becoming an NBA city were (coincidentally or not) buoyed by NBA Commissioner's comments to the media in his "State of the NBA" press conference remarks yesterday ... Seattle is done and Oklahoma City is the almost certain replacement. For some text of the Commissioner's remarks (but not "complete" as that website describes), go here. No shortage exists on the internet about this press conference ... here is another example.

With this backdrop, the Ford Center March 4 kickoff event occurred tonight at Buffalo Wild Wings. Here are a few pics ... excerpts from David Stern's press conference are interspersed with the pics ...

Click any pic for a larger image

QUESTION: Are you more or less equally pessimistic about the situation in Seattle than you were this time last year? And is the Union comfortable with discussing relocation next month given the state of the lawsuit in June?

COMMISSIONER STERN: You know, it's interesting to me, it's apparent to all who are watching that the Sonics are heading out of Seattle. There's not going to be a new arena. There's not going to be a public contribution, and that's everyone's right. I mean that sincerely. So the only question now becomes, is the court going to rule that you can fulfill the terms of the lease by paying money for the remaining two years after this? Or, despite everything, there is some reason to keep them there as the clock winds down.
... continued below
... continued from above
To try to compromise the issue I have urged and supported the Sonics to make an offer to Seattle that would both pay the remaining two years of the lease after this, and an offer to pay the remaining bond outstanding indebtedness, that will remain even after the team leaves were it to still stay there for two more years after this, which approaches $30 million. All I can tell you is that in response to that request by me, the offer was made, and it was rejected. I think it's bad public policy.
... continued below
... continued from above
I feel actually badly that the team, when it leaves either now or in two years, is going to leave behind an unpaid debt which the city has. The team's not going to leave it behind, but the city's still going to have a debt on the building. And the Sonics have offered to pay it off. The city says no, and so we'll see.
... continued below
... continued from above
But I don't feel uncomfortable. We know how to observe court orders and we do a pretty good job of that. So if the court says they're not free to just pay and leave, then they won't just pay and leave.
... continued below
... continued from above
But if they are, then they'll be gone and there will be two years of payment, and the city will not have the benefit of the $30 million or so and other things that would be worked on if there were an amicable solution to that.
... continued from above
Indeed, even recently as I read the newspaper occasionally, the Speaker of the House was heard to say that if the university wanted a new stadium, that was certainly a good reason to consider extending the tax that helped build the baseball and football stadiums, but certainly not for the Sonics. And into that sort of wind, it doesn't make a lot of sense to sail.
QUESTION. You seem convinced that they're going to leave?

COMMISSIONER STERN: I see nothing -- I don't know why anyone would expect in the absence of what they've been saying all along, which is funding for a new building of some kind and a plan for it that they would be staying. I accept that inevitability at this point. There is no miracle here.
QUESTION: I wanted to get back to Seattle really quick. Do you think or suspect that the reluctance for public financing of any kind up there is directly related to the current ownership, much like in Charlotte there seemed to be resistance with that?
COMMISSIONER STERN: No, absolutely not. They're equal opportunities deniers of aid. Howard Schultz, who was a resident of Seattle, who owned the team previously, who invested time and energy leading lobbying efforts at the city council, at the county level and at the state level, was unsuccessful. Clay Bennett actually spent more money, developed more plans, made more visits, and the answer was no, no, a thousand times no.

Sooo ... In exchange for an early (after this season) exit, Clay Bennett's group offered to chip in $26-27 Million to Seattle which would pay off the Key Arena's bond debt. Seattle said, "No." A thousand times. No.

Where does that leave Oklahoma City?

Duh! It leaves us "here": If the March 4 vote passes, we got us an NBA team! Hooahh!

And, by the way, I enjoyed seeing and rubbing elbows with all of you "despicable" people last night! Huh? "Despicable?" So says commenter Steve H who identified himself as being with ... see the comments, below.

Chamber's Big League City MySpace Page
Chamber's Big League City web page

Related blog posts:


Anonymous said...

Doug, I am so hopeful that you guys in the CITY can get this passed. Everyone down here in the southern part of the state can`t wait for the NBA to return once again and to stay!


Doug Dawg said...

Me, too, myhornets2!

Not all are impressed with the potential, though. Here is a comment to this thread left by Steve H ...

"Publicly funded stadiums are about one thing when it comes down to it: The total failure of the human spirit. Seeing you despicable people in person tonight more than affirmed that for me.
-Steve H"

That's funny ... each of you in the above pics (and the many others that I didn't take a picture of) is notified by Steve H that you are a "despicable" person!

Perhaps THAT organization will be having a party ... I (for one) can't wait for the news!

steve said...

The despicable people I referred to were the PR gals and Cornett who's sole goal here is to subvert democracy. Sorry about the confusion and I can't wait until this is all over...

Doug Dawg said...

Steve, that's so bogus. "Subvert democracy?" What do you think that you, and I, and everyone, who votes on March 4 will be doing ... we will be engaging in an exercise in democracy.

Doug Dawg said...

Steve has left another comment this morning but I've declined to post it and here's why:

Steve, I took a look at your website just now and I don't find a place there for comments or feedback. But, send me another comment indicating that has been done and posting a link where that can be done, and I'll open the door to you here again. I've even saved your last comment for posting here when that happens.

As it is, since you and I are obviously at cross-purposes and since you've been allowed to comment here but I and others can't comment there, that's where I am at with you right now.

Make sense? And you are all for democracy, right?